|
| Yes, we definitely plan on doing that, but we have to finish a production version of the bridge first, and also to wait for the final version of ICEfaces 2.0. The reasons are because there is currently some small overlap of functionality between portletfaces-tools and portletfaces-bridge, and also there are some ICEfaces 2.0 composite components in portletfaces-tools which *might* need to be refactored in order to take advantage of new ICEfaces 2.0 components. But that's so much for the question, because it's good to know that there is increasing demand for JSF 2.0 in portlets. |
| Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. |